Login About us Contact us Terms & Conditions

Comments

The CLARK Dynasty of Weston
published by PHClark - 4 years 10 months 24 days ago.

Clark Picture

Standing from Left.
David John (1881-1988), Amelia Melinda (Milly) (1882-1948), Jim (Douglas) (1891-1949), Cecil (1880-), Percy (1885-) Jessie (1876-1965), Ernest (1886-1966),

Seated from Left.

Blanche (1883-), Harry (1878-), Constance May (1875-), Herbert H. (Bert) (1873-1950),  Mary Ann (Dolly) (1889-1980)


The CLARK Dynasty of Weston
published by Pat Hase - 4 years 10 months 24 days ago.

I have been sent this by a member of the CLARK family.  This accompanied the published photograph.

‘Family Reunion
‘The return home on holiday from South Africa of Mr. H.H. (Bert) Clark, son of the late Mr. and Mrs. Charles Clark, formerly of St. James Street, resulted in an interesting reunion with his six bothers and five sisters. All the brothers had been prominently associated with the local swimming club.

‘After having a group photograph taken, the Clark family – augmented by wives and children to a total of over 30 (no husbands?) – chartered a chars-a-banc to pay a visit of filial affection to Shipham (birthplace of their father) and Priddy (birthplace of their mother).

‘High up on Mendip top the party felt the need for tea and called at a tiny wayside inn. The good wife, learning that the company was so large, temporarily collapsed, but, being resourceful, quickly revived to practical purpose. There was enough food, but the crockery was limited to half a dozen cups and saucers, which had to be used in turn, while the tea was brewed in an eight-gallon milk churn.’

Many thanks for sending this piece of background information.  

 


The CLARK Dynasty of Weston
published by Jenny Towey - 4 years 10 months 24 days ago.

Smashing photo, Pat


August 2020 Newsletter
published by Jenny Towey - 4 years 10 months 27 days ago.

re the churchwardens marrying each other...you'd have thought that the transcribers would have realised that something was 'not quite right'...

I was going to watch the U3A Zoom lecture yesterday - but got so engrossed with checking my Ancestry DNA matches (below 9cM) that I completely forgot the time.

I have a marriage certificate free to a good home...William JONES to spinster Catherine EVANS, 17th May 1862, Capel Ebenezer, Mallwyd, Merioneth: this William is a farmer, whose father is named Rowland JONES - also a farmer.  Catherine's dad is also a farmer - but named as Rowland EDWARD. 

Wondering if we could offer up our unwanted certificates to everyone else?  (I needed 'my' William to be a painter - not a farmer - got the right cert now...).  I wouldn't mind organising it...


John Dyer 1803-1880
published by littlebinton - 4 years 10 months 30 days ago.

Thanks for the info.  I did realise that John Dyer and Louisa Wride were on two separate pages of the 1841, but what I did not realise was that the 1 in the box indicated a start of a household and // the end.  I have always gone by the actual address in the first column, but in this case there are no separate residences shown in that column.  Thank you for that - it will be very useful moving forward.  Also I did not decipher the occupation of F.S. on the census.  If I had it would have been clear that they were all living in the same house.  I guess there isn't a marriage and they were just co-habiting, but it is surprising that they had 8 children together without marrying - must have caused a bit of gossip at the time!

As a point of interest, Louisa had 3 children between 1834 and 1838 where the baptism records show her as the single parent and the child's surname as Wride, John being one of them.

Thank you for all your help.   

 


John Dyer 1803-1880
published by Pat Hase - 4 years 10 months 30 days ago.

If you look at the image of the 1841 census, Louisa WRIDE is entered as a F S - Female Servant and is in the same house as the DYER family which is spread over two pages. 

  

To the left of John DYER's name is a 1 in the box which indicates the start of a household and the double // above his name is the end of the previous household.  Go to the next page and you will see a double // below Louisa's name and the start of a new household with Phillip BADMAN.  Just above Louisa's name is a single / which shows a different occupant but in the same house.  So she was living in the same house as the DYER family, not next door.

I agree with you that the Probate seems to confirm that they were not married when their son John was born - hence the use of both surnames for him as Executor.  He was not necessarily a beneficiary - A Copy of the Will will show the details of any bequests. 


Page 120 of 485 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125

Forthcoming Events

Library Help Session
Saturday, 5th July, 2025 14:00 - 15:30
Physical Members' Meeting
Wednesday, 9th July, 2025 14:30 - 17:00
Library Help Session
Monday, 14th July, 2025 10:30 - 13:00
Workshop by Zoom: In the footsteps of Hans Fowler Price
Wednesday, 23rd July, 2025 19:30 - 20:30
Library Help Session
Monday, 18th August, 2025 10:30 - 13:00
<- View calendar for more

Recent Comments

Gone but not forgotten
18 days ago
June 2025 Newsletter
27 days ago
Cox
1 months 19 days ago
Cox
1 months 19 days ago
Cox
1 months 20 days ago
GOULSTONE
1 months 20 days ago
GOULSTONE
1 months 20 days ago
May 2025 Newsletter
1 months 22 days ago
more comments





Website written and designed by:
Weston IT Solutions
Copyright (c) 2018