Login About us Contact us Terms & Conditions

Research Forum

    print
Margaret URCH of Yatton
published by AnnieD on Tue, 25/02/2014 - 13:21

Dear Alan,

Wow! Thank you very much for all the information on Margaret and her ancestors, fantastic.  Unfortunately, Margaret Urch is not a direct relation but Sarah, George Brown's first wife is.  You correctly noticed that I did not include Sarah's maiden name, very perceptive of you, as I do not know where she and George Brown were married.  Thank you, I appreciate your offer, yes please if you do not mind looking that would be extremely helpful, as Sarah and George's marriage is the only one I have not been able to find.

George and Sarah Brown's first child, George was christened in Jan 1803 along with his sister Sarah on the same day, at Congresbury.  However on the 1841, 1851, 1861 Census in Wales, George states his age as 40 yr, 51 yr, and 62 yrs respectively, so he was probably born around 1799 but not baptised until 1803 and his parents either married before 1799 or George was born out of wedlock but not christened until after his parents were married.  Thank you once again Alan, your help is much appreciated.

Ann Dalton

  login or join us now to post comments

Comments ..


Submitted by on Tue, 25/02/2014 - 14:17

Hi Ann,

I have done a bit of searching and found your George BROWN who married Sarah HOUSE in Wyke St. Lawrence, Worle on the 11 April 1799. They were married with the Banns being read and the Witness's were D. Davis and Thomas Lloyd.

I don't yet know where Sarah HOUSE was born which needs a bit more research.

Alun URCH

 

 

   login or join us now to post comments
Submitted by on Tue, 25/02/2014 - 14:57

Hi Ann,

I have found two Sarah HOUSE's; One was baptised in Yatton on the 16 November 1760 to Anthony & Mary HOUSE and the other Sarah HOUSE was baptised in Congresbury on the 11 December 1774 to a Single Mum called Ann HOUSE.

I am inclined to believe that your Sarah HOUSE was from Congresbury born of a single Mother.because her birth is nearer to George BROWN's own birth, plus there is a Congresbury connection, but we cannot rule out other Sarah HOUSE births either, so more research is needed.

Without their ages upon burial it will be difficult to ascertain which is the right one, the only way is to find other Sarah HOUSE baptism's and eliminate them.

Alun URCH

   login or join us now to post comments
Submitted by AnnieD on Tue, 25/02/2014 - 15:30

Hi Alun,

I am flabbergasted with how quickly you found Sarah House baptism, well done and thank you.  Sarah of Congresbury seems like the correct one as her age fits perfectly.  Now I am wondering, whom Charles Brown, Sarahs' son, named his first born son after, maybe a friend or maybe Sarahs' unknown father.  Charles named his first son Edward Brown, this name did not occur in his wifes family line at all.  Thank you for you stirling efforts, very much appreciated Alun.

Ann Dalton

   login or join us now to post comments
Submitted by on Tue, 25/02/2014 - 16:00

Hi Ann,

I am no expert but in my experience the naming of children before the 1800's did reflect on the parent's names but after the 1800's this culture seemed to change and new names were used that were not family related, so Edward might have been the first time it was used.

I am glad I was of some help and I wish you luck in your research.

If you need any further help just post a message.

Alun Urch

 

   login or join us now to post comments
Submitted by AnnieD on Tue, 25/02/2014 - 15:01

Dear Alun,

My oh my! you are very quick in locating George and Sarah Browns' marriage, thank you.  I too, had found this marriage earlier, however the Wyke St Lawrence parish, through me a bit.  I did not know whether this was the correct George or not.  I see from the parish map on the back of 'Buckets & Spades' journal, that both Worle and Wick St Lawrence parishes are adjacent to Banwell and Hewish parishes.  So they are most likely the correct couple, also the time frame fits.  Thank you very much for confirming my suspicions about this marriage for me Alun.  

I suspect that Sarah would have come from one of the nearby parishes, Sarah died in 1816 at the age of 41 yrs, therefore born about 1775.

Ann Dalton

   login or join us now to post comments

Is your research stuck?

Use our research forum and


(If you are already a member please login (if not already logged in). If not why not join us now - see the link to the membership page.


Forthcoming Events

Physical Members' Meeting
Wednesday, 14th May, 2025 14:30 - 17:00
Library Help Session
Monday, 19th May, 2025 10:30 - 13:00
Workshop by Zoom: Henry Smith: A Most Notorious, Naughty, False, Lying Fellow: A Global Black Sheep or Maligned Character?
Wednesday, 28th May, 2025 19:30 - 21:00
Library Help Session
Saturday, 7th June, 2025 14:00 - 15:30
Physical Members' Meeting
Wednesday, 11th June, 2025 14:30 - 17:00
<- View calendar for more

Recent Comments

Cox
4 days ago
Cox
4 days ago
Cox
5 days ago
GOULSTONE
5 days ago
GOULSTONE
5 days ago
May 2025 Newsletter
7 days ago
May 2025 Newsletter
7 days ago
May 2025 Newsletter
8 days ago
more comments





Website written and designed by:
Weston IT Solutions
Copyright (c) 2018